Hi all,
Is there a way I can set an answer incorrect when Wanikani thinks “Meh close enough” when the answer is semantically wrong?
Example below: It probably thinks “Time” and “Thing” as a typo, but I was just plain wrong. Now it thinks I know what it means when I actually don’t ! I cannot imagine a userscript would be needed for such a basic thing, that’s why I ask here first.
I don’t think this is that wrong, actually.
While technically true, I do feel it is a bit out of tune of the meaning from what I can read on the WK page. It tells about the position of something in a sequence, while you can talk about the first time doing something.
You know what, the more I type here the more I convince myself it is actually not that strange at all.
Wanikani doesn’t let you mark something wrong on purpose. For this you need the script Double Check.
That emotional dwelling on these kinda situations, I feel like helps you with them in the future. So, I’d make note of it and then keep it.
But if it seems like something like “nah, I’munna forget this one,” you can close WK and open again, and it’ll go back a few reviews. Just purposefully get it wrong when it comes back up so you can get it as a review again sooner
That will only work if you haven’t answered the reading correctly already in the same review session.
If you close reviews in the middle of a review session, all those items for which you have answered both reading and meaning correctly are recorded as correct and taken off the queue. (It’s enough to close reviews by clicking on the little house at top left, you don’t need to close WK or your browser.)
All items for which you have given only one correct answer remain open. For those, you will get both questions asked again when you restart reviews.
I think it’s important that WK doesn’t simply forget those items that you’ve closed out correctly. Imagine if your wifi died on item 99 of a 100-item review. If WK hadn’t recorded all your correct answers, you’d be mighty pissed about having to repeat the whole durn thing, I imagine.
