Well, guess who‘s won: cake for the win!
Stuff about the post final round:
There has been a very near tie. Let‘s decide between the last two options! The post final round is here!
For details of the third round, see here
For the details of the second round, see here.
Here are the details of the first round:
We have 17 submissions! In this first voting round, you can choose as many as you like and the best 7 go on to the second round. The first round closes on 24 April 2018, 11:59pm Pacific time.
The poll is private, for unbiased voting .
Vote away!
Race to El Dorado
Race to El Dorado
Race to Shangri-la
Race to the end of (the Earth) WK
Race to Infinity
Race to Paradise
Race to burned Paradise
The Race
Race to Enlightenment
Race to 悟道 enlightenment?
Race to Koichi
Race of the Crabigator
Race to the Stars
Race to the Cake
Race to Golem (because ろくじゅう sounds like “rock Jew,” which essentially what Golem is)
Some of them may need to be changed a little though, as it seems like the forum sometimes refuses multiple-emoji titles… Doesn’t hurt to try, at least.
It’s an idea, that would mean those appearing twice, with and without emojis, will from now on just be counted as one (the best result counting). In the second round, I will remove all emoji and we will see… It could also stay free to edit, so that every regular may change emojis at will.
Sorry, I know I’ve been complaining a lot but I want to just make sure everything’s fine. Shouldn’t we have a set amount of votes, about 8 or so. If you don’t then some people will only get 1 vote to someone else’s 9. Then that previous person wouldn’t get to have a say in what they want as a consolation.
Also, having a statement like this is a vote on the race thread posted here listed somewhere on the top might look more organized. Just my opinion, don’t mind.
I don’t really get what you mean. You mean a set amount for the first round? The more options you choose, the less the vote counts, which is only fair in my opinion. Also, this is only the first round. Later rounds will be restricted to one or two votes per person.
I believe you’ll probably have to restrict how many options you can choose in future rounds. Otherwise everyone might just pick everything and we won’t get a result.
I will restrict it, because as you said, otherwise we will never get a conclusive result. The next round has 7 items, so 3 votes would be good in my opinion. Then the best 3 will constitute the last round with only one vote per person.
More so if the person who only voted once loses then he has no say as to what of the remaining he would have preferred, Whereas the person who voted multiple time does.
That’s why we have multiple rounds. Now is the moment to choose all those you like, if your favourite makes the selection, you can choose it lateron, if not, maybe some others will. If a person decides to just vote once to give that title an extra high voting value, and that title doesn’t make it, well the person will have to contend with wathever is left in the next round.
If we tell everybody to choose 8 or however many options, some people may randomly click something just to fill their votes… I prefer if everybody has to ponder themselves how to vote.
.
