材 and 村 should be considered visually similar kanji

These two kanji aren’t in each other’s Visually Similar Kanji section and I really think they should be.

10 Likes

@Mods what do you think about this?

1 Like

Hey, I agree these are very similar looking kanji. I’ll get them connected via the visually similar kanji section!

4 Likes

great, thanks!

I don’t disagree at all…but sympathize with all involved since seemingly the vast majority of kanji can appear similar depending on perspective – and how well it can be seen due to size, font, and visual acuity. :laughing: