Which is better, IMABI, GENKI, TAEKIM?

I think genki is mandatory and the best ( especially when you have a tutor or classroom)
Then IMABI and TAEKIM, if I used genki then the both is still important?
Learn the three consume a large time, and I don’t see any reason to do that

1 Like

and I still not mentioned Human Japanese

1 Like

None of them are mandatory (I’ve never used Genki, but then again, maybe my Japanese knowledge could be better.)

I don’t think Genki is really in the same category. It’s a full textbook with drills and multimedia included. It’s a professionally produced product. Of course, that also means it’s not free.

I think imabi is probably better than Tae Kim, in the sense that Tae Kim seems to have some mistakes or lazy explanations. But imabi is a little bit difficult to parse at times.

1 Like

I use both GENKI and Tae Kim. I feel like Tae Kim’s explanation becomes SOOOOO much easier after I finished the first GENKI text book. I was so confused with Tae Kim at first but now it is very useful to me.

I want to use both, and I have same feeling as you
then I will use TAEKIM AFTER I’ve master genki I

many says imabi more comprehensive and more clarify than Taekim, what do you think?

I would use GENKI I first and then Tae Kim basic grammar.
After that I went to Tae Kim’s Essential Grammar and finish that.
Later on I do Tae Kim Special Expressions and start GENKI II.

Then I might go to intermediate after I finish Advanced grammar of Tae Kim and also GENKI II.

nice route,
many says imabi more comprehensive and more clarify than Taekim, what do you think?

1 Like

Why, thank you.
I have seen IMABI’S site but I find the explanations are harder than Tae Kim’s.
I might use IMABI after I finish GENKI II + Tae Kim and actually give IMABI another try. :smiley:

oh, that’s good experience
I will follow this

If you have just begun to study Japanese I would recommend Genki. I think it provides better context when learning new grammar points as well as useful “trivial” knowledge.

In my opinion, IMABI is too much for a beginner and should only be used if you have already studied for a long time and become interested in learning more about nuances and like to think in detail about the Japanese language. It will overwhelm you as a beginner.

Tae Kim feels like the fast-food version of learning Japanese to me :smiley:

2 Likes

my plan :slight_smile:
Genki 1 ----> Taekim ( first part )----> Genki II ----> Taekim (rest )------> IMABI

1 Like

Your Japanese is up there with the most respected on this forum.

OP:

I like Genki because it’s simple and I like IMABI because it’s in depth and good for furthering your knowledge.

Taekim is okay but I only use it as a last resort. My main resource is the Dictionary of Japanese Grammar and, failing that, Maggie-sensei’s website.

Genki is tried and true but for me it’s meh.
TRY! N5-N1 series are pretty cool. Pair that with Taekim for better experience.
But honestly just do the textbooks that really work for you and help you understand and focus.

This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.