I think that would be a different usage of 結構 though. So that’s why it might not ring a bell for mariodesu.
2 Likes
This isn’t that strange. I notice a lot of speakers of European language make mistakes in English by using “have” or “make” in unnatural ways, because in their language that’s the verb for doing a particular thing, but it’s different in English. Sometimes the languages just don’t line up completely.
4 Likes
Italian is a mix, we say ‘I practice bodybuilding’ for example, but we also say ‘I play football’ and also ‘I make/do sport’ (literal translation) so I’m not sure how in japanese I should translate these instances
and
If there is a general rule I should follow or it can change from case to case, just as in Italian
Stop me if this is a concept I shouldn’t be worrying about at my level
2 Likes
Yes sports are with shimasu in japanese.
Generally a good idea before using a noun + verb comibnation is to search for it and see if it is a thing. It’s called “collocation”. Some combinations feel wierd from a italian point of view but the more you see it used the more natural it will feel.
1 Like
する and やる are pretty versatile. They can be used for many, many things that might have different verbs in English.
Another pair that trips people up I think is シャワーを浴びる (where 浴びる is specifically a verb for having something pour over you), and so it’s not とる (American English uses “take” a shower) or する (but I think some people do say this in slangy ways).
1 Like
I’m actually having the impression that Japanese is way more similar to Italian, than to english 
Ok, I guess in this case I just need practice and to find them in the wild to get a feeling on it right?
4 Likes
Good day people,
Question
Why does the に particle mark the performer of the action instead of the receiver as normal, in the passive sentences with the helper verb れる?
I got bit by a dog.
Why does the dog takes the に ?
It actually sounds very natural and right to me, I’d just like to understand the logic behind it
1 Like
The に particle works in both directions actually. It’s either “to/for something/someone” or “from something/someone”. So in passive voice it’s “from something/someone”. It’s just that in English it’s “by” as in “bitten by the dog” which coincides with the tool/means usage of で which in English translates to “by” as in “by train” (電車で) if one were to translate word for word.
To avoid stringing に and confusing the reader/listener, から can also be used in general, but not sure if it’s also applicable to passive voice.
2 Likes
Grammar dictionary says that に indicates the speaker’s psychological closeness to the human source, whereas から does not, therefore に is ungrammatical if the source is, say, an impersonal institution to which one can hardly feel close to, which it illustrates with the sentence ヒルさんは文部書(から/に)奨学金をもらいました. It does not otherwise explicitly require or preclude the use of either in other contexts.
5 Likes
Thanks for the explanation, I didn’t think it was this easy, even tho I’m lost on your last part about から, maybe I still haven’t studied the concept you’re referring to 
no need to provide an explanation if it’s something I have to study yet 
1 Like
It’s something you will stumble over pretty soon. から is a particle generally meaning “from”.
I think in Genki you learn it first when telling a time interval. (“From 5 to 6 o’clock” as an example)
To maybe make it clearer. This particle can be/needs to be used instead of に in some cases (see Belthazars example sentence)
3 Likes
Clear
I take the opportunity to ask a couple question that came to my mind while studying genki lesson 4
-
Which is the etymology of the word おまえ (you)? Is it made of the honorific お + まえ (in front of) to say something like ‘honorable you in front of me’? This word today is considered rude, right? I remember reading somewhere (but could easily remember wrong) that once in the past these personal pronouns where honorable and formal and they became rude with time, is this true?
-
On the genki book - lesson 4, I found the word 一人で that is presented as ‘alone’. What is the で here? Is it the で particle as to say ‘alone in that place’?
1 Like
Exactly, though without the second person pronoun - more like “the honorable (person) who is in front of me”.
Yeah, in the scale of politeness for second-person pronouns, it’s definitely towards the less-polite end, but keep in mind that in general, Japanese tends to avoid second-person pronouns altogether.
I’d say it’s closest to the “by means of” で. I did it by means of one person, sort of thing.
5 Likes
Everything is clear except of this, ‘by means of’ is an english expression that I never fully comprehended, would you explain it in another way if possible?
1 Like
How did you come to the party?
I came by car. くるまできた
I came by train. でんしゃできた
I came by myself. ひとりできた
7 Likes
That almost sounds like you used yourself as a means of transportation 
Honestly, I think “by means of” is a bit of a contrived way to approach the use of で here, though I’m not sure what a better way would be. I’ve always just accepted it as “you use で here”.
3 Likes
で has a lot of uses. I think this definition from weblio is the most relevant:
which roughly translates to “expresses the circumstances an action happens in”
7 Likes
Aye, precisely my thinking. 
4 Likes
honestly, it just feels like the て form of だ to me but I’m not sure how correct that is
4 Likes