Need some help understanding the spirit of 近く when used as an adverb.
WaniKani describes 近 as meaning “near” or “close”, and for the 近い adjective, both “near” and “close” are valid answers. But for 近く, used as an adverb, “nearly” is a valid option, but not “closely”.
I know that “nearly” and “closely” aren’t completely interchangeable in English:
“That punch nearly hit me” for example uses “nearly” as a synonym for “almost”, something that “closely” doesn’t do, but I don’t think that’s the difference based on the example sentences.
Is this just a matter of “WaniKani doesn’t include every possible synonym” or is there a subtle reason that “closely” is not a good (or as good) a translation here?
As an adverb, 近く almost always relates to time, and we usually don’t use “closely” that way.
It’s like “soon” or “shortly.”
Here’s a Japanese definition: 現時点から時がそれほど経過していないさま。もうすぐ。近々。
EDIT: This is also making a distinction between this and 近い conjugated to 近く. This is a unique entry that has its own meanings from just the standard conjugation. If you feel that you want to think of this entry as just a conjugation of 近い, then you can do that, but it’s not exactly what WK was aiming to teach originally.
Aaaah that makes so much more sense.
I was only thinking of the spatial version of “nearly”, and despite the “soon” synonym I never pictured the English “Christmas is nearly here” temporal usage.
Got it - that clicks now, thank you!
This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.