Once again, I am unsure if @JoeyBertschler is being genuine or straight up trolling.
Iām pretty sure heās somewhat sincere.
Although itās hard to tell since heās kinda all over the place.
This screencap gives me PTSD
Report back how many you still remember in a week or a month.
I set a reminder for this thread for October next year to see how hard they failed
Im impressed by your optimism.
I donāt personally think they will be around for that long (for one amongst a few reasons)
I really wish you luck in knocking those reviews out (not just the 5 new ones )
If this was me, I would quit, sadly. Which is why Iām 90 days in and 90 days zeroing out my reviews. But that is me and I know myself enough from past experience to know I would just give up.
Iāve chipped away a pile of nearly 1000 reviews after seven months of a break; it IS possible.
I donāt think for a moment that this particular user will do that, but itās possible without burning out ^-^
I am not affiliated with this app and itās free. I just like it, was a 1 click installation.
A little mix of both. Not denying the moonshots, but trying, testing and training
This is like my 3rd thread
You will need a spreadsheet
Been a couple days, remember about 3/4
(tho I only did my 30 min. today so I only got to revise a fraction of the cards)
WaniKani Double-Check incorporates lightning mode, so you donāt need that script installed.
How about a friendly wager with the profits going to a good cause? (Cancer, Water, you name it. Would film/livestream)
Thanks
I knew some of the scripts were redundant because of others, but not which ones
Iām pretty sure @Joeni was saying that you donāt have the intent to do so, not that you donāt have the capacity to do so. Betting on your own intents sounds like a conflict of interest or insider trading I guess
Yes, exactly right. After all, I said in the post heās replying to:
But hey, @JoeyBertschler youāre the successful entrepreneur, Iām just a regular working schmo supporting a family, so perhaps just donate some money to charity regardless?
You, again.
Leaning heavily towards ineffective troll or idiot-who-thinks-heās-a-genius. The two arenāt mutually exclusive though; no reason he canāt be both.