As we discussed in your thread, our calculations are different. I’m still looking at a few options. [EDIT: I followed up in your thread about the calculation method].
At first I was unsure whether I wanted to know my accuracy, but it is actually much higher than expected… I usually have around 85% (although sometimes up in the 90’s or low in the 70’s). But your site shows 92% … Seems a bit high haha. Thanks for updating rfindley :)
haansn08 said...
Anyone lower than 89,8%? Please....
My reading accuracy is 89,3% -_- And since I'm taking longer than usual on this level I am now predicted to reach level 60 in September 2018. I'm never going to make it...
haansn08 said...
Anyone lower than 89,8%? Please....
My reading accuracy is 89,3% -_- And since I'm taking longer than usual on this level I am now predicted to reach level 60 in September 2018. I'm never going to make it...
KarelvanHasselt said...
Hey there. Would it be possible to alter the start date to the date when you did your first lesson? It's throwing things off slightly for me.
If you're worried about average level-up speed, just click on level 1 (or any other level) in the bottom graph to exclude it from the calculation. It will turn semi-transparent.
For the start date itself, unfortunately, the only info WK gives is when an item unlocked, and the level 1 radicals are unlocked when you create your account. I'm open to ideas if someone knows of another way, though.
KarelvanHasselt said...
Hey there. Would it be possible to alter the start date to the date when you did your first lesson? It's throwing things off slightly for me.
If you're worried about average level-up speed, just click on level 1 (or any other level) in the bottom graph to exclude it from the calculation. It will turn semi-transparent.
For the start date itself, unfortunately, the only info WK gives is when an item unlocked, and the level 1 radicals are unlocked when you create your account. I'm open to ideas if someone knows of another way, though.
I guess maybe he's asking if you could calculate it based on when the first kanji was unlocked, but I like the feature of excluding a particular level like you suggested because when I first signed up I stopped using WK for like a year.
As we discussed in your thread, our calculations are different. I’m still looking at a few options. [EDIT: I followed up in your thread about the calculation method].
Wow, that’s great, thanks !!! I’m wondering rfindley, what’s your accuracy rate? I think I read somewhere that you haven’t got any items wrong since level 16, so I’m curious
As we discussed in your thread, our calculations are different. I’m still looking at a few options. [EDIT: I followed up in your thread about the calculation method].
Wow, that’s great, thanks !!! I’m wondering rfindley, what’s your accuracy rate? I think I read somewhere that you haven’t got any items wrong since level 16, so I’m curious
I’ll preface by noting that I did lots and lots of study outside the SRS… which was maybe not efficient, but has been very effective. When I first started, I think I was somewhere in the mid-90s, and one time I got the dreaded 89% on kanji for one level (I can’t remember which one). After that, I totally changed my study method. Now, at level 60, my overall average is 99.97%.
As we discussed in your thread, our calculations are different. I’m still looking at a few options. [EDIT: I followed up in your thread about the calculation method].
Wow, that’s great, thanks !!! I’m wondering rfindley, what’s your accuracy rate? I think I read somewhere that you haven’t got any items wrong since level 16, so I’m curious
I’ll preface by noting that I did lots and lots of study outside the SRS… which was maybe not efficient, but has been very effective. When I first started, I think I was somewhere in the mid-90s, and one time I got the dreaded 89% on kanji for one level (I can’t remember which one). After that, I totally changed my study method. Now, at level 60, my overall average is 99.97%.
Don’t know if your calculations are correct because I have above 90% average too but my reviews are usually around 70-80%
Mempo said...
Don't know if your calculations are correct because I have above 90% average too but my reviews are usually around 70-80%
But still feels good regardless...
+1. But I assume, it also includes the correct re-reviews (of wrong answered reviews) of a session. Which is different to what is shown on the summary page after a session. Also, I wouldn't call the totals 'combined' ... for me, 'combined' means succesful (combined) review of reading and meaning (what is shown on the summary page after a session)... and that cannot be higher than the single accuracy percentages, can it? But this data is probably not available, I would suppose. And WK calls the totals also 'combined', I guess, on the dashboard menus... so that's only my personal view of the term 'combined'. Anyway, nice addition to the stats side.