First of all Wanikani has been so far the best kanji/vocabulary learning tool that i have encountered.
At the time of writing i am on lvl 15.
After each level i notice how i can understand more and more so thanks for that
When i heard about the major content update i was excited especially after reading that it isnât mandatory to switch to the new mnemonics.
However after doing my reviews i noticed that some kanji donât have the older mnemonics available.
Also when checking kanji specs some radical names, affected by the update, still remain in their updated form even though i have enabled âshow old mnemonicsâ.
i have those old mnemonics sticking in my head so i would like to keep them as long as i can.
i see that others too have written about these âproblemsâ but these have yet to be addressed.
i would be grateful if someone would be able to make a user script that would âcorrectâ these minor problems.
i am happy with new content added here and there, it is just these new mnemonics and names.
The old mnemonics only exist for the radicals, not the kanji. There is no way to retrieve the old mnemonics for kanji any longer, so no script would be able to do what you want.
I canât speak for tsurukame, since i donât use it, but as far as crawlers go, I doubt theyâll have a copy.
The mnemonics are technically part of the deep web; they canât be indexed by search engines since theyâre locked behind an account. So, a crawler wouldnât be able to see the item pages with the old mnemonics.
Arenât there flashcard decks that basically ripped all the content off the site anyway? WK would prefer people not do that, but I donât think they would object to people taking the old content and doing with it what they will.
WK should just dump all the old stuff into a file as a community service, making a script takes only a day or two, they donât have to do anything else, and no complaints (except for mobile).
i wonder if posting a link to an archived copy of all kanji, radicals and vocabs is allowed?
If these things are not allowed, would someone with correct knowledge reply to this thread?
It has been a week when i asked if posting a link for an archived copy of the older material is allowed.
There has been no replies that would indicate it would be against the terms.
Respectfully, if there are no declining answers within five days i take it that there is a tacit agreement (An agreement through silence with no contradiction*).
*i am not a lawyer nor an attorney so i am not giving any legal advice.
The old content file in this thread is intended for non-commercial purposes only.
The main idea is to provide source material for script makers.
i did my best to remove identifiable information but if you find some then please inform me.
If you use this file to make a script etc. please give me a credit.