As I do countless reviews per day, I find my mind wandering and observing itself. Several weeks ago I posted these thoughts. This post is kind of related, but different.
I’ve noticed that when a review item pops up, before I actually hunt for the answer, I ask a higher level question: do I even know the answer? I’m very intrigued by how quickly and deterministically I answer (or fail to answer) this question.
- Sometimes I decide instantly that the answer is no (and sometimes I am wrong here, i.e. after the answer is revealed, I realize I did actually know it).
- And sometimes I know instantly that the answer is yes. Note that I can still get the wrong answer in the end, or take a very long time to get the right answer… I just know for sure that this is familiar, and I “should” know it.
- And sometimes, I don’t have an answer instantly…
The most interesting part is what my brain does when the answer to this first Q is “maybe”. Below is a map of this “brain hunt”:
My brain enters this should I think longer loop and must decide how long to stay in that loop before giving up, which I think is one of the hardest micro-decisions I have to make in this entire flow. And even more interesting, when I finally do choose to exit that loop with a “no” and move straight to the wrong answer… was that the right choice?
In general, the wrong answer state is not quite as terminal as it looks, because there are other unspoken questions that follow, and they depend both on how wrong I was, and what path I arrived at this state by. With the path just described (deciding to exit the “thinking longer” loop with “no”), it’s always kind of a shock when I realize, after seeing the correct answer, that I did in fact know it, or “should have” (i.e. it feels very familiar, and my brain was just failing me momentarily). On the other hand, if I see the final answer and my brain registers zero familiarity with it, then my “loop exit” decision was validated, which feels good because I did not waste valuable seconds (even if the zero familiarity itself feels not good).
I think the most intriguing part of all of this is that for the most part it happens automatically. Watching my brain work like a machine on autopilot is just a really strange and powerful feeling, even when I fail (which was kind of the point of that other post I linked earlier). And thinking about all of this makes it easier to embrace failure, and not to worry about the results of reviews. As long as you sit down and throw new review items at your brain, you will eventually master them all. Reentering the loop is part of the process, and the reason we do SRS to begin with.
Does anybody think about nonsense like this? ![]()
