I watched some more movies!
鉄男II BODY HAMMER
This is the sequel to Tetsuo, and the second Shinya Tsukamoto movie I’ve seen. It’s interesting! The stunning and unusual visuals are still definitely there, although I’d say this sequel loses a bit of something compared to the original. It’s in color (although still with a square aspect ratio), and on the whole it feels to me like it hits the beats of a conventional superhero story much more directly. The presentation is still bizarre and outlandish and full of metal and gears and body horror and allegory. But on the face of it, the beats of “guy beset by villains endangering his family → guy manifests powers → guy fights villains to save family” are there. So it felt a little less like lightning in a bottle I guess is what I mean. And it would probably be unreasonable to expect a new soundtrack as stunning as the first movie’s… but I was still kinda disappointed that the music didn’t blow me away.
But I mean I’m totally here for a weird superhero-ish movie with Shinya Tsukamoto’s sensibilities and stunningly unique effects and Tomorrow Taguchi mugging through his scenes! So I ought not compare it to the original and be very positive about it!
A detail that sticks in my head for some reason - the muscle guys.
As listening practice – well these movies are definitely vibe and visual focused, so there isn’t a giant amount of dialogue to catch and I have a hard time now even remembering how well I did. The first Tetsuo was one of the first Japanese movies where I tentatively turned off the subtitles entirely though, so it’s kinda fun that now I wouldn’t really question turning them off.
電柱小僧の冒険 (“The Adventure of Denchu-Kozo” in this English edition - but I have no idea why you wouldn’t just go with The Adventure of Utility Pole Boy, it’s way way clearer)
This was included with the Tetsuos on the (extremely cool) Arrow set I have of a selection of Tsukamoto’s movies, so I watched it, and counted it as a full film because hey, 45 minutes is almost feature length, and there was probably more dialogue than Tetsuo II…
I actually really liked this one! It’s a predecessor to Tetsuo and… it’s like… Tetsuo + a corny tokusatsu show. It’s about a boy who has a utility pole growing out of his back for no particular reason, getting catapulted into the future and having to fight vampires played by the cast of Tetsuo, basically. The more parodic element (mixed with again, Tsukamoto’s unique and stunning visuals), give the effects much more of like a fun, “sweding” vibe than they do in Tetsuo, and I like the tokusatsu and gag manga influences on display. Although it does also come across as juvenile and silly - it certainly shows promise and the novelty is pretty stunning considering how early a work it is for those involved.
I don’t know exactly how much I caught, but I watched without subtitles and didn’t mind it. It does seem like I missed some an interesting detail or two? I don’t think I picked up the historical associations with the future vampires… it sounds like they’re labeled the Shinsengumi in some way?
徳川女刑罰史 (Shogun’s Joy of Torture)
So… I was very curious to see more movies Teruo Ishii had directed after seeing Horrors of Malformed Men, since he’s a cult director with a very long and prolific career and a handful of movies pretty easy to find. This came up in my backlog system and I was very very trepidatious about it because I don’t actually like the sadism element that’s in a lot of exploitation movies - and the way this is sold definitely pushes that angle (I mean… just look at either title).
“Pleasantly surprised” maybe isn’t the right word because… I mean… there is indeed quite a lot of torture, and especially the beginning and end are very hard to watch… but I was surprised in a positive way! Particularly in that the bulk of the movie felt like it fell into place with contexts I was familiar with - Like it’s definitely no so out there that I can’t see the connections to Ranpo and エログロナンセンス stories, and also to other movies I’ve seen at the time and other Edo period pieces. I was worried it would just be “Torture: The Movie!” and be too out there to enjoy, but it’s not unlike Horrors of Malformed Men – the garishness is just achieved through cruelty rather than phantasmagoria. Which is still less my cup of tea! But at least there’s something there. I also found the visuals often very good, like the striking tattoo in the final part.
The historical angle is also interesting to me – I’m still new enough to knowing anything at all about Japanese history that sensationalized depictions like this about the cruelty of the draconian feudal legal system and its persecution of christians are interesting to me just out of curiosity about what kinds of stories get told about what times.
And I also still get a big kick out of recognizing actors in movies like these (which I would not have expected to recognize actors in if I were still just watching movies in English). Here there was an especially cool case: a highlight for me in the movie was the villainous bisexual nun (it’s… definitely an exploitation movie) in one of the stories. For a few days after seeing the movie it was still nagging me that maybe I’d seen her face somewhere before - and then I figured it out! The actor, 賀川雪絵, plays a major recurring villain in the 70s Toei tokusatsu Spider-Man TV show I’ve been slowly watching occasionally! And she plays a spy in a memorably good episode of Himitsu Sentai Goranger! Not a connection I would have expected, but I guess watching a lot of old tokusatsu earns you a passing familiarity with a lot of 60s and 70s character actors…
Like Horrors of Malformed Men I watched it very late at night so I really don’t know how well I caught the dialogue or if I just floated along on the pictures.
Anyway, a lot better than I was worried it was going to be (but still not recommended unless you know you’re curious because of all the torture)
この空の花 長岡花火物語 (“Casting Blossoms to the Sky” in English)
(Thankfully) completely different, this is a Nobuhiko Obayashi (the House director) movie from 2012 - much later than any of his other movies that I’ve seen, so I was very curious about what to expect - would his characteristic odd and kitschy style have mellowed into something more straightforward?
Turns out no. This is still unmistakably an Obayashi movie, and it underlines for me that that style was always intentional - this has just as much extremely noticeable green screens, cheesy collage, super imposed images, etc. as House, along with some technically very poor CG, and it makes me think that all of those seams being so overt is precisely the point.
The movie is an semi-documentary “essay” exploring the spirit of Nagaoka and the way humans process tragedy and pass it down through generations, via the lens of the Nagaoka Fireworks Festival and its role in celebrating rebirth and survival through various calamities, including the Boshin war, earthquakes, and particularly fire-bombing in world war 2. The movie is very interested in how elder generations describe and pass down experiences of war and tragedy, and you see that processing happen via colorful museum exhibits, by stage play, by 紙芝居 etc., and the movie itself is framed as, and feels like, the memories of a grandparent, of horrible things warmly told.
And all of that really clicked for me in the most elaborate scenes, where Obayashi-style visual effects are falling all over the screen, and people are running around on fire with the fire being obvious green screen covers with fire superimposed on them, and scrawled bombers dropping bombs to mumbled sound effects. It felt then to me like the shoddy or silly effects were the movie visibly acknowledging the failure to convey the reality of those experiences. It felt… haunted (with much sadder and more real ghosts than House).
… But it’s a 2hr and 45m movie, and the sentimentality can definitely get overbearing (a violin can only tug at my heartstrings so many times thanks), particularly with the amount of background detail far outweighing the amount of plot (even if a lot of it is interesting background detail, like information about mock atomic bombs that were dropped before the real one), and the editing frenetically hopping from location and idea to historical recreation and back all the time. As an essay… it could definitely be tightened up.
So not perfect by any means! And your mileage may definitely vary with how successful the approach is at conveying something about war and our reaction to it. But it’s definitely doing something interesting, and I thought it was largely successful!
It’s also a very interesting case when it comes to listening practice - because there’s a lot of dialogue and everyone talks quite fast, but the dialogue is 90% about explaining historical things and not plot-crucial (such as there is a plot) - and for all those discussions, keywords will even frequently appear on screen in subtitle form to let you know the kanji for all sorts of concepts. So it’s maybe sort of perfect for listening practice?
I don’t think I got everything by any means (I’m not 100% sure on some of the exact relationship details between two of the leads, for example), but clearly I took something from the movie, and frankly, watching a 160 minute extremely wordy movie in a foreign language with no English subtitles and staying engaged the entire time seems like an accomplishment in and of itself!
This is billed in English as part of an “antiwar trilogy” by the director - all on Arrow Video’s streaming service and on a really nice looking blu ray set I would totally buy if it weren’t region B. I was thinking of watching all three one after the other but… they’re ALL over two and a half hours!! So… maybe I’ll watch them interspersed with other things…