I thank you all for motivating me to race toward this glorious moment. It feels pretty good. I managed to get to level 60 with a wkstats.com calculated overall accuracy of 95.06% though believe me, I have plenty of review sessions with a much lower accuracy rate.
Now if youâll excuse me, a side-affect of doing eight fast levels in a row (and using the re-order script) is that I have a mountain of lessons waiting for me. I mean I also have a mountain of reviews, but the lesson-mountain is much higher.
I wish I could share the cake with all of you, but you know, you need to earn it, and youâll get yours soon enough. Level 60 buddies, though, are more than welcome to have a slice.
Oh, about that accuracy⊠letâs just say I like my âignoreâ button. As long as itâs justified! Maybe Iâll say more about that in my graduation thread⊠You know, after I rest a little. (And thanks for the special area of the forum reminder. I didnât even think about that until now.)
Thatâs because wkstats considers a typical fail as 67% accuracy, like 1/2 reading and 1/1 meaning = 2/3 total. Your actual accuracy should be around 90%.
Congratulations to those who made it to the cake!!
The end of last year I was really close to 60, but I took a break for the winter holidays. I started back up at a not-so-good time in January, and since then, Iâve been taking my reviews as they come, slowly whittling them down, and now theyâre much more manageable. I donât mind taking a slower pace at the moment, so I withdrew (hadnât updated in several levels anyhow). I still have over 200 lessons to get through, so Iâll slowly shift them back into my schedule. I might try to jump into the Naughty Narwhals group (looks like you all have a great time!) when I get my lessons back down.
My goal is to reach 60 this year, and I know I will, but it doesnât have to be now. Knowing I passed N2 was enough for me. xD Now I want to make sure that I actually retain some of the vocabulary I learn.
Yeah I could have been more clear. I mean wkstats considers it as 2/3 accuracy while WK considers it as 0/1, which is far more relevant IMO. If I fail all 200 items in a review, my accuracy should be 0%, not 67%.
As I understand it, and I believe as @rfindley has explained it, this is incorrect. You do not get 67% accuracy for getting an item completely wrong. You get 0%. Itâs like the accuracy rating you see during reviews: every item is considered separately (i.e. meanings and readings are considered separate items), so itâs a percentage of meanings and readings answered correctly.
After reviews, on the summary sheet, you see a percentage thatâs often lower because that number shows the percentage of items that were answered correctly in full (you got both meaning and reading correct). Wkstats.com isnât able to provide that average due to API limitations.
I know WKâs wall of shame gives 67% for a single fail (or 50% for radicals) so maybe I got confused with that.
Thatâs the accuracy I care about though, because thatâs what affects my SRS level.
You can get a close approximation with 1 - (Total Incorrect Reviews / Total Meaning Reviews).
The given accuracy will be slightly too low unless youâve never got multiple fails on an item in a single review session, e.g. failing both the reading and meaning.
Many thanks for the recipe @Sezme! This sounds just as delicious as it looks! I will try it out once I reach level 60, thatâs the perfect incentive for me !
?
