コンビニ人間: Week 2 Discussion

Join the Intermediate Book Club here!

コンビニ人間 Home Thread

Week 2

Start Date: July 6th
Previous Thread: Week 1
Next Chapter: Week 3


End Page (PB) End Page (HB) End % End Phrase Pages
27 22 15% 人間にしているのだった。 9

Word lists - Learn the vocabulary for コンビニ人間

Discussion Rules

  • Please use spoiler tags for major events in the current chapter(s) and any content in future chapters.
  • When asking for help, please mention the chapter and page number. Also mention what version of the book you are reading.
  • Don’t be afraid of asking questions, even if they seem embarassing at first. All of us are here to learn.
  • To you lurkers out there: Join the conversation, it’s fun! :durtle:

Read-along Sessions

Come and read from the previous week’s section, join in the chat about this book or just lurk and listen. Readers of all speeds and abilities welcome - we are here to help each other out. Reading sessions will be held every Sunday at 9:30pm JST.

Week 2 session (in your timezone): Sunday, July 14, 2019 12:30 PM TZ


Mark your participation status by voting in this poll.

  • I’m reading along
  • I’m still reading the but I haven’t reached this part yet
  • I’m skipping this book
  • I’m no longer reading the book

0 voters


Almost missed the end of this week’s part :sweat_smile: I thought “wait, until where are we reading? Oh, until right here, okay”.

1 Like

On page 16 of the hardcover, there is this sentence:


What is the reason for the ことはなかった? Why not just straight up say 教えてくれなかった?

It also makes the 誰も feel awkward to me, since there is no negation in its own clause. How would you even translate 誰も教えてくれた? Not “someone also taught me”, right? That’s more like 誰かも教えてくれた?

Check these out:

You can use [た]ことがない to mean “have not done”. For example, 日本料理を食べたことはない means “I have never eaten Japanese food”. This is different from 日本料理を食べない, which would just mean “I didn’t eat Japanese food”. This also means that the ない really is part of the same clause as 誰も (at least I’d consider it that way) since it’s a set phrase.

So for this:


Stripping out the quote, this means “until now, no one has ever told me [quoted text]”.

EDIT: Maybe “had ever” is more accurate since it’s なかった and not ない. :thinking:


Oh yeah kinda forgot about the ことはない thing. So it changes “no one told me” into “no one ever told me”. Makes perfect sense, thanks :+1:

Edit: I just now realised the ことはない refers to the 誰も, not 私.
I forgot that ない is actually a verb
So it is actually saying that “no one” has had the experience of telling her, not that she has not had the experience of someone telling her. My confusion on that front is now gone.


I don’t know that I agree with that. I think くれた puts the focus on her. She’s saying that she has never been given anyone’s instruction on normal facial expression and speaking style.


Yeah, I’ve been overthinking this, trying to find how 誰も works without a negated verb, but English has the exact same thing.

1 Like


I’m a bit puzzled by the construction of this sentence. The second part is OK. “About 15 part-time workers, of various age and clothes, were awkwardly crawling around the store.”

But the first part is some kind of list of people and the particles are all over the place :

自分と同じ大学生くらいの女の子、フリーター風の男の子、少し年上の主婦と思われる女性 ∅

Are those 3 peoples part of the group of 15 ? (Maybe to show the wide range of people ?) But why this weird フリーター風の男の子 in the middle ? Usually に is linked to a verb.

Not entirely sure but I think this is a shortened sentence with the same meaning as " フリーター風の男の子に似た男や". It might not be exactly “似た” but I get a “a boy with a フリーター looking face” feeling out of it.

And for the rest, it’s just that the や was omitted while listing.

There are probably other interpretations, but I read it as:
[ 自分と同じ大学生くらいの女の子や、フリーター風の男の子 ] に、少し年上の主婦と思われる女性
with both や and に serving to enumerate. や is the incomplete / example-giving enumeration. に is the ordered enumeration XにY “X and then/also Y”, so IMHO this に goes with 年齢: it’s enumerating people from younger to older, whereas the や joins the first two elements within the younger category, if you will.


Wow, this is new to me ! I had no idea に could be used to enumerate things. Thanks Carvs.
I found more information about it in this stackexchange post.


It’s probably related to それに. I can’t find any dictionary entries on it though. I wonder if それに uses this に (“in addition to that”) or if this に is short for それに. Or neither of those I suppose, but I feel like it’s probably something like that.

I found something in DOBJG:

It did not even have its own grammar point but was attached to と, so maybe it is not used frequently?

Also, I wonder whether the “indispensable member” aspect really fits that well here…?


Can you check the entry on それに if there is one? I found it in the Grammar Handbook but it didn’t mention に, and I forgot to check the Basic and Intermediate dictionaries for that entry.

Yes :grinning:


Hm, I did not find anything about それに being short-cut to に (if that’s what you were referring to?) but I found this (in the intermediate one):

My understanding is that there can be a list of things that are enumerated with に or と, and then an additional item is tucked on with それに。


The に here is just enumerating/listing things. See grammar - Particle に to enumerate things / to list items? - Japanese Language Stack Exchange


I am struggling to figure out this sentence:

At 13%

Not sure what めいて means here. jisho has three potential meanings, assuming めいて is the て-form of めく: to show signs of, to turn over, or to tear off; none of them make sense to me. I thought that maybe I was parsing it wrong, but can’t seem to find any other way to split that part that makes sense.

Any help is appreciated!

1 Like

I’m struggling on this one too. :man_shrugging:
Also a few sentences before, there is :


As with so many Japanese sentences, I understand the gist of it, but the details escape me. So I think basically two weeks before the opening they did some intense training with probably some kind of pair exercise, I guess one is doing the 店員 and the other one is doing an imaginary client.

But exactly who is doing what ?
社員を相手にする = dealing with employee. Who is doing the 相手にする? Who is 社員 ?
架か空くうの客に向かう = facing an imaginary client. Who is doing the 向かう ?

Also there is an Aたり、Bながら、Cて、D construction here. There is so many ways to parse that, is there any priority rules ? Or is it completely meaning and context based ?

1 Like

めいて here is indeed the te-form of めく: to have the appearance of.

作り物めいて: looks unreal (fake, made up)