I’m a relatively new WK user, so take this as you will.
I began my Japanese learning journey with AJATT after having already taught myself French to a very high level. Japanese is a language whose sound and mystique had always captivated me. I am a lifelong lover of languages and this one has always been on my ‘want to speak well’ bucket list.
I started with AJATT, but quickly burned out during the RTK phase. I did RTK for 2 months, learned a bunch of kanji, couldn’t do much with it and immediately got discouraged. That left a horrible taste in my mouth and I stepped away from Japanese for five years because I didn’t want to have to learn Kanji in that way. It bored me, it basically treated Kanji as a large alphabet, but one you didn’t really know how to pronounce or what to do with. Although I am new to WK, I can already tell that this method is one that i’ll be able to stick to and even probably accelerate with, but most importantly, it is fun, sustainable, and doesn’t make Japanese feel like an insurmountable mountain that can only be climbed one way.
As someone with a love for foreign languages, I don’t underestimate the value of a large amount of comprehensible input, and when I get to that point, some of AJATTs core tenants may be more applicable for my situation, but I don’t believe that grammar is evil. I don’t believe that studying grammar will somehow disable or handicap you in speaking Japanese.
I’ve been a member of various language learning communities over the last decade, from the old HTLAL forums to the language learning Reddit to various communities of language learning. I can say that there’s some sort of elitism in the Japanese circle from some parties that doesn’t exist to this extent in other communities.
I’m sure Matt’s Japanese is awesome, it certainly sounds so, but he makes wild claims that seem to indicate he believes AJATT to be the only way to learn Japanese. To the point where he’s hated on WK and JFZ. JFZ isn’t for me as its pace seems a bit too slow, but George is awesome as a person and I GREATLY enjoy his videos on Japanese. Matt’s comments toward George in support of AJATT over JFZ were sort of out line and made him come off sort of like an pompous elitist.
I don’t doubt that sticking with AJATT long enough will lead to phenomenal results, but it is not the only way to get to the end, in my opinion. If it works for you, then great, I wish you all the success. At this point, WKani and Genki and grammar/vocab study work for me.
Even if we could definitively state that RTK+AJATT were the most efficient way to reach fluency in Japanese, what would it matter if it’s too extreme for most people to follow? I consider myself an above average language learner and it almost destroyed Japanese for me. What good is a method in which many people are forced to either endure torture or give up? For those people, AJATT is not the best method, and that’s the point here There is no one size fits all approach.