I mean, I could be wrong 
3 Likes
It’s just that I remember a thought I had where I was frustrated by a blacklist and thought to myself “Shouldn’t autocorrect just correct it?” but then I said to myself “Oh well of course there’s a blacklist otherwise I could input this similarly spelled (and similar in concept) word that isn’t correct but get it correct every time”, but unfortunately I cannot recall the exact word that spurred me to think that.
1 Like
I do suspect they did add some blacklists, but not everywhere. For example if you answer “burnable garbage” for 不燃ゴミ, it will be marked wrong although the difference between that answer and “unburnable garbage” is only 2 characters.
8 Likes
That’s interesting. If they do have blacklists, then they really should use them more
12 Likes
There was some discussion about possibly implementing blacklists, but when I asked about it several years ago, it was still in the hopper as a “to do” item. The really big one is, “sake” vs. “fake”… you could, in theory, mix these two up and burn them to completion.
1 Like
Kristen confirmed in this post that they have hidden blacklists:
12 Likes
Thanks for sharing the confirmation! Glad they utilize that now 
I definitely hope they expand upon it ^^
2 Likes
Is the melon somewhere in there?
2 Likes
Maybe if you send them this specific instance in email, they’ll do something about it.
2 Likes
Oh, looks like it was introduced in December
2 Likes
Sent it their way
2 Likes
They should indeed, but then they would probably have to hire a lot of interns who go through every item and think about any possible typo anyone could make and add them to the blacklist. And even then they would probably miss a lot of them. It’s not impossible, but certainly not anywhere near easy.
1 Like
Maybe they could make a forum thread for blacklist suggestions, or something like that? I figure more people would post in something like that compared to having to send an email
4 Likes
That would be a nightmare for them to maintain. Somebody has to constantly follow that thread and filter the blacklist suggestions by usefulness, and then maintain them in the database. Then other people start new threads suggesting other blacklists and then they have to monitor that thread too. Then other people ask that certain blacklists be removed because of reasons. And then there is a debate about whether a blacklist item should be removed or not. Repeat ad nauseam.
Again, not impossible, but they don’t have that many employees to do this.
There is a good reason why the blacklist is secret.
8 Likes
Platron pretty much nailed it. We use the blacklist for specific things, like numeral answers, words that are very close but have opposite meanings, etc. Trying to expand it to just generally include typos that are other words would be good for when you’re doing reviews, but it would be really tough to stay on top of.
12 Likes
I was thinking of something more like just making a single thread and just directing everyone there. Then, for each post there, I just thought of it is as checking “does this word have a different meaning than the actual answer” and adding it if it does.
That said, I did figure it probably wouldn’t be that simple. I don’t personally have any experience working on anything larger-scale*, so it’s not that surprising if any suggestions I make are bad. Thanks for informing me!
*large-scale as in management needed, not regarding budget or physical size
2 Likes
It probably has less to do with experience managing large scale projects than knowing the nature of people on the internet. Quite impossible to predict once you open the floodgates.
2 Likes
Establish desired behavior, build for it, everyone does everything except that…
3 Likes
I believe so? @oldbonsai has shown me the formula the system uses to judge how many accepted deviations are allowed, but I’m afraid I don’t remember the specifics.
2 Likes