I get that feel bro
Generally speaking, in the U.S. the grading system is roughly (with a little bit of leeway): 92-100-A,
85-91-B, 77-84-C, 70-76-D. At least that has been my experience in the multiple school districts Iâve worked in around the country. Although, it really wouldnât surprise me if the scale is getting lowered in the last few years since I retired.
Um wtf no. 70-79% is a C. 60âs would be D
Thatâs why thereâs vacation mode. I took a year off and only got between 200 to 300 reviews when I came back.
As to grades in the US, no wonder so many people say that theyâre failing. Getting 50% in other countries would be a bare pass but not so in the US, it seems. That would be a precursor to failing, wouldnât it?
hahaâŠthe US system keeps changingâŠ(ignoring the +/- systems)
When I was in school as a kid it was easy⊠you pretty much only had to be breathing to get a CâŠyet there were the handful of problem kids that did get bad gradesâŠ
90-100 A 80-89 B 70-79 C 60-69 D and < 60âŠyou failâŠ
GPA was A=4.0, B=3.0 C= 2.0, D=1.0 and well again you failâŠ
Then later after I graduated high school ages agoâŠthey then started weighting the scores for the Honors/AP classes (which I took but wasnât given these same things)
A=5.0 B=4.0 / Donât know if C and D got bumped upâŠbut in any caseâŠthey keep changing the targetsâŠ(even though I was in these classes it never seemed fair to those students that didnât quality for the GATE/HONORS/AP programs to be stuck with a measly 4.0 and others with a 5.0âŠif someone is comparing their grades they are already at a disadvantage (on paper anyway)âŠ
College depends on the class, sometimes its graded on a curve so you hope for a CâŠand if you are the one to mess up the curve (would be me or one of my friends) you didnât tell anyone that you actually did your homework and studiedâŠright? heheâŠ
now with all the new teaching stuff core curriculum or whatever itâs called its changed furtherâŠhonestly I have no idea what they are doing nowâŠall I know is that my friend who is also an engineer cannot teach his daughter how to do math because âitâs wrongâ that way even though the method is perfectly fine and the answer is correctâŠ
I say learn however you learn best and as long as you know the material well enough to explain it to someone else then you know itâŠthatâs all there is to it
Answering wrong or not answering doesnât make a difference in your score. Usually theyâre designed so you canât solve all the problems in the allotted time, so getting things wrong is itâs own âpunishmentâ because youâre wasting time.
It also depends on the exam, because theyâre leaving themselves some wiggle room in grading. If everyone did too well, theyâll raise the %'s to lower the average.
What type of tests are designed for you to fail? They way my teachers in uni and high school told us they wrote the test is they did it themselves, then doubled the time and thatâs how much we had. We donât grade on a curve here.
Exams can get quite stressfull and the very few that donât do it that way are always appreciated, but Iâm used to it, so it doesnt really seem all that strange to meâŠ
I did basically the same thing earlier in the year Definitely feels good to get it done in one go. Iâd imagine once you get into the higher levels, itâs probably better to focus on other aspects of learning Japanese so it might be good to take a break from Wanikani at some point.
https://community.wanikani.com/t/time-for-some-fun/34855/7?u=peterwhite
Here in Romania we donât get graded with letters, we get points, usually on a 1 to 10 scale (for some subjects you can get points from 1 to 100 but then it gets divided by 10 eventually). For most exams, the passing grade is 5 so itâs a static standard. Whatâs grading on a curve(did I get that right)? Iâm having trouble following your conversation.
Grading on a curve means that everyones grade is boosted
Itâs grading so that the grades follow some predetermined average, like a gauss curve.
If everyone did too poorly, theyâll raise the grades. If everyone did too well, theyâll lower the grades.
Hmmmm, I think Iâd prefer the objective grading standard Iâm used to. So then, the A, B, C etc grades are what exactly?
One reason itâs done that way is because the difficulty of exams varies from year to year. Someone getting a bad grade on a tough exam could have gotten a good grade on an easy one, had he taken it a year later.
Not trying to say itâs necessarily better, but I feel like every system has itâs ups and downs
Canât speak for the A to F scale because we donât use it here either, I only used A to imply the best score attainable.
15 sec per answer is a lot tho!
It should click immediately, 2-4 seconds to type it in
A is 90 -100%
B is 80- 90
C is 70 - 80
D is 60 - 70
F is 60-
American grade system is weird
I donât really agree with this
Usually youâd want your SRS intervals to be right at the point where youâre starting to forget things, so no hesitation for all of them would mean the intervals are too short for you.
Also, depending on how long he didnt do his reviews, some of those will have longer intervalls than usual. If you wouldnât even have to think about those, with the interval being extended by a week or so, theyâre again most likely too short for you.
The fatigue of doing reviews three hours straight deserves a mention as well
Thatâs interesting. I didnât know that sort of system also existed! Generally students here are always supposed to be able to finish the test and maybe even have time to look over it once more if theyâve learned and understood everything. Sometimes teachers put in a bonus question or something, for students that study outside the curriculum. But in that case usually this points donât count towards the maximum, so itâs possible to get 105% or something like that.
It might just be my major. With most topics, especially math and physics, the better you understand something, the faster you are. Partially because you donât hesitate as much, but mostly because thereâs so many ways to get to the solution and one approach being way faster than the others.
Iâve certainly taken exams where I could have solved every problem, but didnât manage in time because I didnt practice enough. Professors here feel quite strongly about time as a factor in scoring.
It does kind of make sense, but Iâm not sure if I like it or not
I always thought everyone did it that way
Australian grading system is:
85-100 = High Distinction
75-85 = Distinction
60-75 = Credit
50-60 = Pass
-50 = Fail, but if youâre juuust under fifty and do well in some aspects, you can get a Conceded Pass (though, looking at my uni website, they apparently discontinued that a few years back. Aww. Also, thereâs Unsatisfactory Fail, in which you got a high enough mark to pass, but didnât meet a required aspect, like lab attendance, or you missed the exam or something, so you fail overall.)
At least, thatâs how it works at my university. Itâs possible that other universities have slighty different numbers.