faster than sonic, thanks you
The reason “fastly” doesn’t exist is because “fast” is an adverb already. It is a Flat adverb.
So with that said, the same thing exists in Japanese, “adverbializing” words that are already adverbs generally is unnatural.
5 Likes
Wow, I’ve never heard of that before. Thanks!
It means what it says. It means that the result is proportional to the amount of the thing that you do.
The above means: If you know him, to the extent that you know him, he is not understandable.
The nuance is: the more you know him, the more non-understandable he is.
Another example:
このラーメンは食べれば食べるほど辛くなる。
this ramen, if you eat it, to the extent you eat it, it becomes spicy.
or more localized: This ramen, the more you eat it, the spicier it gets.
2 Likes
Does anyone know the difference between 性(せい) vs 性 (しょう). Having some hard time distinguishing when to read it as one or the other in non-set context.
せい is Kan-On (漢音), しょう is Go-On (呉音). I think it just means that the words were imported at different times (or changed to Kan-On), there should be no real rule why one is used or the other. I think it implies that せい should be more common (?).
See in wikipedia here. There is a numbered point 3. in that paragraph that explains how -ei and -ou can come from the same root.
[I’m just interested in that, but no guarantees 
]
Edit: There is a list here: 性とは (セイとは) [単語記事] - ニコニコ大百科, しょう seems to favor religious terms (as you would expect from Go-On).
Kanjipedia does not note a distinction with the meanings and the readings the way they will when they legitimately never overlap.
Hey guys got a question about the conditional ~たら
So I came across this sentence
もし食べに行きたかったら、行こう。
and thought that it looks kind of wrong, because 行く+たら=行ったら. But then I realized that it translates to
If you want to go out to eat, let’s go!.
So my question is, if that actually is the ~たら Form of 行きたい and if there are other mixed forms e.g.
男らしかったら or 始まりそうだったら. (I don’t know if thats accurate?)
Yes, it’s the たら form of 行きたい > 行きたかった > 行きたかったら
And yeah, pretty much anything that can be put into the た form, can also go to たら form.
1 Like
失敗の原因は何かと言うとそれは勉強不足だったからです = The reason of the failure is because of lack of study.
Is this grammar awkward?
Is there a reason you ask?
“何かと言うと” is one chunk on its own.
Oof it’s its own thing? I just read it as 何か space と言うと. Rikai-kun picked it up as a single item, but the definitions made no sense so I assumed it was an error.
PS: What does 何かと言うと mean? My Japanese isn’t good enough to read your link…
It basically means “every time”.
何かきっかけがあるたびに，いつも同じ言動をとるさま。
At every chance, always doing or saying the same thing.
3 Likes
Muchas gracias, Senior Leebo
Uhh… what is the better option between:
寝ている間
寝ている時 or 寝ているの時 ??
What’s the difference? Are both correct?
寝ている間 = while (he) is asleep
寝ている時 = when (he) is alseep
寝ているの時 is wrong. You don’t need a particle between a modifying verb and a noun.
3 Likes
But it’s essentially the same thing in a conversation, at least that’s what I’m getting. Are there nuances to it? Or they’re simply interchangeable.
The nuances are similar to the English translations I gave, and I feel a little like you’re not spotting them there.
間/while = in the space between when he falls asleep and when he wakes up, the action will take place
時/when = when the condition “he is alseep” has been met, the action can take place
Ordinarily the grammar dictionary will specifically give a contrast when there’s two similar terms like this, but for some reason it hasn’t in this case.
2 Likes
So they’re the same thing.
while = I’ll rob his house while he’s asleep.
when = I’ll rob his house when he’s sleeping.
disclaimer: I’m not going to rob anyone’s house.
No, I wouldn’t say they’re the same. 間 always expresses a period of time with a beginning and end. 時 falls within such a time, but could be any point in time during that. It doesn’t necessarily express a beginning and end.
At least that’s the way it seems to me.
4 Likes