Ah, yeah. Saving the API key to jStorge is a good idea. Nice. (I'm going to add that too :)
RayderBlitz said...
I have been wondering how many reviews I will and/or have accumulated at certain points and overall.
I'll give it a try, thanks for sharing this!
Edit: For some reason I had to install it twice for it to work, though the code seemingly was the same..
And now that I took a look at it, I can say that it's another really near addon to the site. Also, on a sidenote: I finally got a confirmation concerning my feeling that Lvl 5 "was one of the hardest", overall it seems that I by far have the most reviews there.
Thanks for trying it.
I am going to add a couple more display options (and the save API key thing) I'll move it to a different place on the dashboard, maybe right down the bottom so it doesn't interfere with other scripts.
hoovard said... maybe right down the bottom so it doesn't interfere with other scripts.
Tbh I actually like the current positioning, if anything I'd move it upwards. Since the script doesn't automatically show all the data when loading the dashboard it doesn't really take up a lot of space and after taking a look at the table you can just clear it again, so personally I'd rather have it higher up than further down.
If you still want to move it to the bottom anyway, may I get you interested in some (for lazybones like myself easy/convenient) way for the user to decide the positioning?
Edit: One thing I noticed is that when you reload the data of the table without refreshing the page (the clear button doesn't reset the counter either) the "total reviews" counter just keeps adding the "total reviews" count to the specific counter instead of resetting to 0 first and then adding to it... Well, either that or within 5 minutes I did about 75k reviews. c(°_:_°)つ
hoovard said... maybe right down the bottom so it doesn't interfere with other scripts.
Tbh I actually like the current positioning, if anything I'd move it upwards. Since the script doesn't automatically show all the data when loading the dashboard it doesn't really take up a lot of space and after taking a look at the table you can just clear it again, so personally I'd rather have it higher up than further down.
If you still want to move it to the bottom anyway, may I get you interested in some (for lazybones like myself easy/convenient) way for the user to decide the positioning?
Ah, sure. Yes up the top is fine.
Interesting idea to be able to choose the position of it. I'll see if I can do that.
RayderBlitz said... Edit: One thing I noticed is that when you reload the data of the table without refreshing the page (the clear button doesn't reset the counter either) the "total reviews" counter just keeps adding the "total reviews" count to the specific counter instead of resetting to 0 first and then adding to it... Well, either that or within 5 minutes I did about 75k reviews. c(°_:_°)つ
Ah, good spot. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll fix it
quick question though, what about people who reset levels?
Well, now then. That's an interesting question.
It depends whether a reset puts the meaning_correct, meaning_incorrect, reading_correct, and reading_incorrect properties back to zero.
Also there are different types of reset I guess. There are the folk that go back to an earlier level, and then like Breadstickninja who stayed at level 50 but had all his kanji reset to apprentice. I don't know what that did to his answers.
I guess that level resets also reset the answer tracking properties, but the breadstick type doesn't... but that's a guess.
I’m listed as having slightly fewer reviews than freakymrq, who’s six levels my junior. Maybe that’s an indication that my kanji reset also reset those review counts?
(Also, whether or not 260,000 reviews is all of them or just most of them… That’s a lot of reviews.)
Wait a second… That really is a LOT of reviews. There are about 8,000 items on WK, which would mean on average I’ve done about 32 reviews per item. But it only takes 8 reviews to burn an item if you get them all correct. And I’m listed as having 90% accuracy… but I’d be having to screw up a lot in order to review items on average 32 times each. Something about this seems off to me.
Or another way to think about it, that would be an average of 306 reviews per day since I joined the site. Now, it’s gotten up to there more than a couple times, but 300/day is happily an exception rather than a rule.
BreadstickNinja said...
I'm listed as having slightly fewer reviews than freakymrq, who's six levels my junior. Maybe that's an indication that my kanji reset also reset those review counts?
(Also, whether or not 260,000 reviews is all of them or just most of them... That's a lot of reviews.)
Ah, yes, that sounds likely then. There is chunk of information in what the API returns called "user_specific" which contains those answer tallies, and stuff like an item's SRS level. Sounds like maybe that whole section gets emptied. Except maybe the "available_date".
Did you have to do the lesson for each of your reset items again? Or did they just all appear in your review queue right away?
as far as i know, reading and meaning are counted seperately. So it would be 16.000 items on wk. But this would still mean 16 reviews per items, which is still strange
BreadstickNinja said...
I'm listed as having slightly fewer reviews than freakymrq, who's six levels my junior. Maybe that's an indication that my kanji reset also reset those review counts?
(Also, whether or not 260,000 reviews is all of them or just most of them... That's a lot of reviews.)
Wait a second... That really is a LOT of reviews. There are about 8,000 items on WK, which would mean on average I've done about 32 reviews per item. But it only takes 8 reviews to burn an item if you get them all correct. And I'm listed as having 90% accuracy... but I'd be having to screw up a lot in order to review items on average 32 times each. Something about this seems off to me.
Or another way to think about it, that would be an average of 306 reviews per day since I joined the site. Now, it's gotten up to there more than a couple times, but 300/day is happily an exception rather than a rule.
it’s 16 reviews you need answer correctly to burn a kanji or vocabulary, 8 reading and 8 meaning. If you make 1 mistake it’s 16 + 1 (the mistake) + 6 (the 2 levels and the review you made the mistake on)
For example: you get it all right up to enlightened and then screw up the burn review. You have done 14, + 1 mistake when trying to burn and +2 correct ones to finish that review, but it still gets reset to guru. You then need to do a review to get it to master (+2), one to enlightened (+2) and another one to burn it (+2). So you had 1 mistake and already did 23 reviews on it instead of 16.
Every mistake adds at least 7 reviews (if the item isn’t in the first 2 apprentice levels)
Btw: technically we do another 2 (or more) reviews for every item during the lesson.
Edit: and this means it’s more like 150 reviews a day in WK county style
BreadstickNinja said... Wait a second... That really is a LOT of reviews. There are about 8,000 items on WK, which would mean on average I've done about 32 reviews per item. But it only takes 8 reviews to burn an item if you get them all correct. And I'm listed as having 90% accuracy... but I'd be having to screw up a lot in order to review items on average 32 times each. Something about this seems off to me.
Or another way to think about it, that would be an average of 306 reviews per day since I joined the site. Now, it's gotten up to there more than a couple times, but 300/day is happily an exception rather than a rule.
Hmm, maybe that does sound a bit fishy
ShotgunLagoon said...
BreadstickNinja said... ...
you're right, that is suspiciously high...
Yeah, you're right
Even with the "Count meaning/reading as one review" checkbox It could bit strange
Seems like there might be a hole in this, I'll look into it.
Naryoril said...
it's 16 reviews you need answer correctly to burn a kanji or vocabulary, 8 reading and 8 meaning. If you make 1 mistake it's 16 + 1 (the mistake) + 6 (the 2 levels and the review you made the mistake on)
For example: you get it all right up to enlightened and then screw up the burn review. You have done 14, + 1 mistake when trying to burn and +2 correct ones to finish that review, but it still gets reset to guru. You then need to do a review to get it to master (+2), one to enlightened (+2) and another one to burn it (+2). So you had 1 mistake and already did 23 reviews on it instead of 16.
Every mistake adds at least 7 reviews (if the item isn't in the first 2 apprentice levels)
Btw: technically we do another 2 (or more) reviews for every item during the lesson.
Edit: and this means it's more like 150 reviews a day in WK county style
That's a good point too, thanks for the input
I'm going to go back to the python and make sure that I am not using numbers more than once or something stupid like that
