"Radicals" that assert sounds

It’s been stated that 工 asserts the sound こう when it’s used as a radical. I’m not sure if it’s every time. There are so many to look up that I didn’t want to bother. In any case, I’d noticed this with a few other radicals (traditional or not) as well:

曽 asserts そう or ぞう (I checked every instance on jisho.org).
昆 asserts こん (I checked every instance on jisho.org).

Do you guys know of any other cases where this sound assertion is across every usage?

(I found this topic from 2015 discussing similar concepts:)
https://community.wanikani.com/t/ken-the-squid-wears-soo-many-masks/10087

There’s a user script for keeping track of these

As you noticed, it’s often not universal. This is because not every instance of a particular element is in a phono-semantic compound, or sometimes changes to kanji over time obscure the original sound relationship.

12 Likes

Oh noes. My plan to Leebo Leebo failed due to sluggish keyboard response.

12 Likes

Excuses, excuses…

2 Likes

My favorite article about this which tests the reliability of different phonetic compounds:
https://namakajiri.net/nikki/testing-the-power-of-phonetic-components-in-japanese-kanji/

3 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.