Yay! Go for it
Pinging you in case you’re still interesting in reading this with us
Here we go!
Went with a ghost emoji. Feel free to suggest a better one though
Will have a look at the schedule in the coming week. I expect it’ll be a one-story-a-week 17-week schedule though. EDIT: Never mind, the first story is humongous
We Live in a Society.
The intermediate book club just closed its poll, but if you still feel the itch to vote on something come over to the Beginner book club and have a look at that poll!
Or, come over to the Advanced Book Club if you feel like upping your game a bit!
We’re currently voting for our next pick:
If you’re interested in adding yet another book to your busy reading schedule, come over to the Mystery Novel Book Club at Natively and vote for our next pick. The poll closes on October 17th, and reading starts at Halloween! (only a couple of days after the IBC’s next pick, おばちゃんたちのいるところ!)
Before y’all disappear into the seasonal holidays, winter sports or summer sports activities, this is just a quick heads up that I will run the next book club poll early next year, probably from January 2nd!
In other words, if you have a book you would like to read with the club, now is a good time for proposing it. We currently have 10 (!) free slots for books unless I overlooked some nominations again , so please go wild
How do you all feel about me nominating a book that is part of a pair, but recommending the better of the two on its own rather than reading both, knowing that the one I’m recommending is better read second if you choose to read both? Technically there’s no set order, but I think the weaker one should be read first based on loose plot connections between the two, or skipped entirely. They are both on the shorter side, but combined they are definitely too long for IBC. So should I nominate the weaker of the two to accommodate people likely to read both? Should I nominate the better of the two knowing that it’s not ideal for people who end up reading both? Should I skip the nomination entirely because this is way too confusing?
Author: 佐々木 雅弘
Page count: 156 pages
Natively: 禎子の千羽鶴 戦争ノンフィクション
This is the true story of Sadako Sasaki, who was 2 years old at the time when the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and years later became severely sick from side-affects of the radiation and while hospitalized folded a thousand paper cranes because of the legend that doing so would grant the folder a wish. This book is written by her older brother.
True take on the life of a girl that has become famous in Japan (and worldwide). See Wikipedia page for more history in English. Her story is often told to school children in Japan on the anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing. This book covers from her birth through her death through the eyes of a family member and shines a more personal light on what would become almost a legendary story.
I struggle to read non-fiction sometimes and most often find myself sticking to only fantasy or sci-fi stories, but I picked this up on a visit to Hiroshima years ago and have wanted to read it ever since.
- well-known story
- available in both hardcopy and ebook
- on the shorter side
- furigana for all kanji make it more accessible than the vocabulary would otherwise indicate
- contains footnotes for potentially unfamiliar terms (kindle version links directly to these)
- lovely charcoal illustrations
- some difficult vocabulary terms early on (not many after the first couple chapters except for some medical terms near the end)
- it’s a sad story
First Three Pages of Chapter One
Taken from Amazon preview because I’m horrible at taking pictures of books:
How much effort would you need to read this book?
- No effort at all
- Minimal effort
- Moderate effort
- Significant effort
- So much effort my head might explode
- I don’t know
First time nominating anything, I hope this looks okay! Let me know if I need to make any edits.
The kindle version has some slightly more legible samples btw
How about making one nomination and then if it wins we can vote on whether we read the first book or skip it? Only with the caveat that you only vote for it if you are willing to read together either way. Though I suppose the caveat might artificially reduce the votes it gets if, say, everyone just wants to read the 2nd book
Having 2 different nominations may be good for more accurately judging who wants to read what. But it’s not great that it can eat up 2 votes, and it might be hard for people to judge whether they want to read the 2nd book while avoiding spoilers. Splitting up the votes might also reduce the chance of one of them winning
Seems like the best option depends on how flexible voters are, which we can’t know a priori…unless—why not have a poll! EDIT: this poll is apparently not really relevant sorry for the confusion
- I only read books in order
- I don’t mind sequence breaking
- It depends on which book it is
Disclaimer: Poll results are not conclusive and enforces no action from any actor, legal or otherwise.
Whatever you go for I hope you don’t skip the nomination. What if it’s something everyone wants to read??
The problem is that the tone is so different between the two books. I’m not sure I’d even know how to write a joint nomination.
Well again, there’s not technically an order. They were published on the same day and take place in alternate universes. I read the one I consider second first and I enjoyed it quite a bit.
Spoiler in case you were intentionally avoiding the titles
Your description is making me think of the 僕が愛したすべての君へ and 君を愛したひとりの僕へ movie pair.
Were those based on a novel/got novelized, or is it just two similar gimmicks?
Oh I misunderstood then. So why do you recommend reading the ‘weaker’ one first if you’re reading both?
oh damn, I have this book actually. Bought it at the Peace Memorial Museum in Hiroshima in 2018, the year before I seriously started JP studies. Tried reading it early in my studies but it was tough even with all the furigana, so I didn’t get very far. Remained in my tsundoku pile ever since.
Would join the book club if this book gets picked
They were based on novels.
Because while I think they can work read in any order, it feels more natural based on their plots and tone. Short version (no plot spoilers): the one I consider weaker made me feel depressed the whole time I was reading it. Granted, I don’t know if that is the common/intended feeling or if it just hit me that way for some reason.
Phew, difficult question. Of course if we were sure that the first book would spawn a spin-off club, then my vote would be to nominate the first one (if you think it’s still a good book and an interesting read, of course). But history shows that while we had successful and long-lasting spin-off clubs, we also had books that were dropped after the club read the first volume. So it’s a bit of a gamble.
In reality we also read books out-of-order in the clubs (e.g. the ABC read Yougisha X which technically is the 3rd book in a series of loosely connected books revolving around the same main characters) so I’d say it’s not a bad thing in and of itself to nominate just the second one.
Also, if somebody really wants to read the first book first, they might even choose to do so out-of-club (time permitting of course).
Bottom line: I can’t really give a decisive answer, sorry! I’d suggest you pick whichever one you think is more entertaining for the club (and therefore more likely to win at some point).
It’s a shame it’s such a complicated thing with having two books, because otherwise they are the perfect difficulty and length for this book club.
I was just checking the books on Amazon and there is now a spin-off sequel too, it seems. 僕が君の名前を呼ぶから